Member-only story

Why “Willn’t” Isn’t Used While it Makes More Sense

Ahmad Zabir
3 min readSep 21, 2020

--

Photo by Waldemar Brandt on Unsplash

Contractions

First of all, we come to the term “contractions”. Contractions are simple, shortened words that are mostly used in informal speech and writings. The most common contractions are: haven’t — have not, she’d -she had, they aren’t — they are not, could’ve — could have, she’ll — she will and so on. To form a contraction, you just have to join two words, drop out some letters, and put an apostrophe to indicate the place where the letters have been dropped out but the case is not same when it comes to the contraction of “will not.”

Why Willn’t Is Not A Word

The contracted form of will not is “won’t”. Now the question arises why aren’t we using “willn’t” as a contracted form of “will not?” Or why “willn’t” is not a word? The answer is quite simple that we are just following the changes that our linguistic ancestor had made. But still, there is a reason for “willn’t” not being a word.

The word “won’t” is a contracted form based on the older way of “will not”. Back in the time it was still not decided how to write or pronounce the modal verb which is known as “will” nowadays. Earlier it was written as “wil” in present form and “wold” in the past form. But still, over the next few centuries at different times and places, the word “will” came out as wulle, wool, woll, welle

--

--

Ahmad Zabir
Ahmad Zabir

Written by Ahmad Zabir

Persuasive Storyteller | Shaping Brands | Startup & Career Consultant | Ecommerce & Sales Specialist | SEO & SMM Analyst | Director Contwre

Responses (2)